Archive for the ‘THE LONGEST CON’ Category

Oh Lord, You Are So Absolutely Huge!

Theologians tell us that God has all the perfections, probably because an imperfect God is such a scary prospect that no one wants to think about it. (Unintelligent Design, anyone?) Among His attributes is also placed being “infinite”, despite the fact that this logically excludes His being the Creator. (If God has created a physical […]

Posted on April 29, 2009 at 07:48 by Hugo Grinebiter · Permalink · 6 Comments
In: THE LONGEST CON, Religion And Conceptual Muddle

A Religious Choice?

One of the commonest Christian rhetorical tricks is to claim that it is essentially a religious choice to posit the non-existence of God. If that is so, then it must be a communistic choice to posit the falsity of Communism.

Who Is Angry?

Listen – really listen – to the preacher shouting “The Lord is angry!” then ask yourself how likely it is that he is saying something about the world beyond his own endocrine organs. No, it is all just too transparent. The wires running behind the Wizard’s curtain lie in plain sight. We might as well […]

Slaves To Metaphor

Christianity rests entirely on two overlapping social metaphors, namely salvation and redemption. The former term, which means “rescue”, is more transparent than the latter, which means “repurchase”, e.g. of a slave or an insurance policy. Consequently, evangelicals ask if you are “saved” but not whether you have been “repurchased”. The reply that one “does not […]

The Meaning Bug

Our heads are not tabula rasa, open to considering the world without prejudice; information can only be processed by the brain designs that we actually possess. Natural selection in the human social environment may have produced an organised cognitive system responsible for the illusion of both personal immortality and personal destiny. There is experimental evidence […]

Posted on May 3, 2009 at 09:40 by Hugo Grinebiter · Permalink · Leave a comment
In: THE LONGEST CON, Religion As Design Fault

The Unimaginability Of Death

When Descartes said that it is logically impossible to doubt that you are thinking, he meant that it was logically impossible to doubt that you are thinking at the same time at the same time as you are thinking. For I can quite easily doubt today that I was thinking yesterday. However, while there may […]

Baldwin And The Cook

The dying King Baldwin I of Jerusalem told his cook, “On this subject, as you love me, or as you used to love me when I was alive and well, so should you keep faith with me when I am dead. Disembowel me with the knife; rub me inside and outside especially with salt; fill […]

Immortality As Syntax Error

The “mind” is not an inhabitant of part of the body, but is one particular way of describing certain behaviours of that body; consciousness is a pattern of standing waves across the entire brain, an emergent function of the complexity of electrical phenomena; emotions are the subjective experience of changes in neurochemistry; and decisions to […]

More On The Natural Language Of Death

People wondering whether the game of life is worth the candle are invariably informed that their burden or problem is “better than being dead”. Oh, really? How would the speaker know? This is yet another example of the logical error of treating existence (in our case, life) as a predicate attachable to a subject or […]

Save Our Whats?

“Oh God, if there is a God”, prayed an anonymous soldier before the Battle of Blenheim, “Save my soul, if I have a soul”. Clearly the soldier did not know whether or not he ‘had’ one of these things, despite presumably knowing who he was and other useful things about himself. When I was a […]